[AD] RE: [AD] allegro-config patch: sed expression seds too much |
[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]
> Which is pretty much the whole point of the patch; it places
> the onus on
> allegro-config to emit the right cflags, not on the Makefile. One day
> we might even learn how to find the correct paths and then we
> can just
> change allegro-config rather than every Makefile ever written.
Mumble mumble, yeah I kinda see your point. It's just that this is
an assumption on how the target system is configured. Oh, I take
my argument back. Who cares about other configurations anyway :)
> BTW Vincent, what mail software are you using? Only check out the
> subject line of the message I replied to ;-)
Outlook. I used to use Mutt when my home system was on the internet,
but I'm at work here, and Mutt can't access Exchange (well, I've not
tried *that* hard). And I need Outlook to view HTML emails (such as
the ones I'm inflicting on you all, unfortunately).
Do you mean the stream of Re: [AD] Re: [AD] ? I didn't notice it
as me... I noticed that, and checked the subject of an email I
was answering to, and it had the correct 1 occurence of it...
Might be fixed now though. Outlook was complaining about some
discrepancy between the server and the client, and asked me
to choose what do preserve and what to dump, without telling me
what I would preserve and dump!
I eventually chose one, and it seems to be still working...
--
Vincent Penquerc'h
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ | http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/ |