Re: [AD] C++ fix math

[Jason Winnebeck <gillius@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Vincent Penquerc'h wrote:

> same name when it's not needed. So, I wanted to know whether
> this same name was needed, and if not, rename it to another
> name with a "fix" prefix.

This was just the discussion we were having earlier and that is what I 
was lobbying for, was to place the cos operation in the Fix class as either:

static fix fix::cos(fix x);
or
fix fix::cos();

In C++, classes and namespaces do what prefixes are normally for in C, 
so no need to call it fixcos but instead fix::cos.  I believe it was 
decided to leave it as it is, though.

Gillius