Re: [AD] pack_ungetc

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


> But first and foremost: do we fix pack_feof() ? The main drawback is the
> one described above. The main advantage (besides conformity) is to
> simplify the code in src/file.c

The patch is available at:
http://perso.libertysurf.fr/ebotcazou/packfeof_ansi.zip

I don't plan to merge it for the 4.1.0 though.

What it does:
- pack_feof() and pack_fseek() are more consistent with their ANSI C
counterparts,
- pack_ungetc() and pack_clearerr() are added to the API (as inline
functions).

Two tests are also included in the archive.

--
Eric Botcazou
ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx



Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/