RE: [AD] docs patch

["Vincent Penquerc'h" <Vincent.Penquerch@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Title: RE: [AD] docs patch

> > I think the whole thing is caused at a high level by the
> > fact that a chunk is a temporary file, and then copied
> > into its parent when the chunk is closed.
>
> Does this remark still hold in light of my answer to Peter
> (packfiles and
> chunks behave the same wrt this problem) ? I'm not a
> specialist of packfiles
> at all.

Yes.
To make sure, I had added traces in the encrypt_id routine
and some other places, and they did not match when reading
and writing.
However, I don't think plain chunkless PACKFILEs have this
problem. Easy enough to test.

--
Vincent Penquerc'h