[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
George Foot <gfoot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>First, I don't really see what would be gained by porting the
>Unix version to cygwin; but I can see that it's useful if the
>regular mingw32 version works fine with cygwin even without
>"-mno-cygwin", in case users want to use cygwin features from
>their own code which also uses Allegro. I think Henrik just
>said that this works anyway, so that's cool. :)
I did'n say that. Sven said the allegro demo etc. worked without -mno-cygwin,
not lowlevel allegro code. That requires some work.
>The only licensing implication is for
>the user who wants to distribute an executable; they'd have to
>either distribute source or pay the commercial licence fee.
>That's their "fault" for using cygwin features, it's the bargain
>they make.
Be sure to DOCUMENT THAT IN BOLD TEXT IN THE README FILE! :o)
Yours sincerely
-Henrik Stokseth.