[AD] fixceil() weirdness

[AD] fixceil() weirdness

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: Allegro Developer <conductors@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [AD] fixceil() weirdness
From: Sven Sandberg <svsa1977@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 20:52:37 +0200

Hello,
Why does fixceil() set errno if the argument is bigger than 32767? 32768
certainly fits in an int. Is this a mistake or was it made deliberately
for some reason?
-- 
Sven Sandberg    svsa1977@xxxxxxxxxx    home.student.uu.se/svsa1977

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] fixceil() weirdness
  - From: Bob
- Re: [AD] fixceil() weirdness
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: [AD] sincos
Next by Date: [AD] warning: -funroll-all-loops and -funroll-all-loops broken in gcc 3.0.4 (at least in the djgpp flavor)
Previous by thread: RE: [AD] sincos
Next by thread: Re: [AD] fixceil() weirdness

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/