RE: [AD] Mini-synchronization API proposal for 4.1.x

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


Title: RE: [AD] Mini-synchronization API proposal for 4.1.x

> - fully portable: on platforms that don't support threads
> (DOS, Unix w/o
> pthreads, Darwin), do nothing. In particular, not a
> replacement for internal
> "DOS-style semaphores" (flags that prevent re-entrant interrupts) (1).

Do you supply an API for creating threads ?

What is recursive locking, and its main differences with, hmm...
non recursive locking I suppose :) ?

--
Vincent Penquerc'h



Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/