Re: [AD] Possible new features for Allegro?

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: conductors@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] Possible new features for Allegro?
From: Laurence Withers <lwithers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 14:24:35 +0000

In reply to Vincent Penquerc'h <Vincent.Penquerch@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>    It doesn't slow your game down, it doesn't 
>    make Allegro harder to use, it doesn't make it crash more, 
>    so I'd like to know your reasons for complaining about this 
>    non-existant "bloat". 

All fair points, but it is extra code to be maintained and changed when
we do certain things (for instance, function prefixing, the change to
unicode, changes to internal Allegro structures, etc).

Perhaps this is a good reason to move certain things to independent add-
ons?

Bye for now,
-- 
Laurence Withers, lwithers@xxxxxxxxxx
                http://www.lwithers.demon.co.uk/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

References:
- RE: [AD] Possible new features for Allegro?
  - From: Vincent Penquerc'h

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: RE: [AD] Possible new features for Allegro?
Next by Date: RE: [AD] Possible new features for Allegro?
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] Possible new features for Allegro?
Next by thread: Re: [AD] Possible new features for Allegro?

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/