| Re: [AD] official beta (Re namespace again) |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On October 31, 2001 06:59 am, you wrote:
> I wrote:
> >> Yes, you are correct. This is one of the very few instances where there
> >> is nothing we can do but ask users to change their code (in this case,
> >> move the inclusion of `allegro.h' to below the definition of `FOO').
>
> In reply to Thomas Fjellstrom <tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> >what if FOO is defined as:
> >
> >struct {
> > BITMAP *key;
> >} FOO;
>
> struct BITMAP;
>
> struct {
> struct BITMAP* key;
> }FOO;
>
> #include <allegro.h>
>
> Bye for now,
Lets not and say we did... that is way way to confusing for a beginner...
--
Thomas Fjellstrom
tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx
http://strangesoft.net