RE: [AD] Header splitup.

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: Allegro Conductors <conductors@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [AD] Header splitup.
From: "Vincent Penquerc'h" <Vincent.Penquerch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 10:07:24 -0000

Title: RE: [AD] Header splitup.

> Therefore I propose to get rid of gfxasm.inl (which is
> useless since asm is
> not portable and not available on every platform) and move
> its material to
> gfx.inl; same rationale for getting rid of mathasm.inl and putting its
> material in fmaths.inl; patch attached (don't forget to delete the two
> files).

I think the point was to allow a platform to define asm version of
some routines, and have fallback versions.
If putting everything in the (platform independant) .inl files, that
will mean it contains a lot of #ifdef THAT_PLATFORM stuff, which is
not very nice...

--
Vincent Penquerc'h

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] Header splitup.
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] Borland C++ port patch
Next by Date: RE: [AD] Header splitup.
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] Header splitup.
Next by thread: Re: [AD] Header splitup.

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/