Re: [AD] more about memory leaks

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: "Allegro Developers List" <conductors@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [AD] more about memory leaks
From: "Eric Botcazou" <ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 01:02:07 +0200

> General contract for exit functions is to remove itself from the
> exit_func_list. See, for example, debug_exit().

What a funny convention ! What's the rationale ?

It seems I'm not the only one to get caught by it: there is precisely a
memory leak caused by a slot allocated by _add_exit_func() and never freed !
(in the test program)

--
Eric Botcazou
ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] more about memory leaks
  - From: Stepan Roh

References:
- Re: [AD] more about memory leaks
  - From: Stepan Roh

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] Allegro 3.9.38 and gcc 3.0
Next by Date: Re: [AD] more about memory leaks
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] more about memory leaks
Next by thread: Re: [AD] more about memory leaks

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/