Re: [AD] to prefix or not to prefix (sigh)

[Laurence Withers <lwithers@xxxxxxxxxx>]

In reply to Peter Wang <tjaden@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>I'm sick of old code rotting.  If 4.0 is released with prefixes,
>either I need to update my old code, or use an old WIP. 

Or use the compatibility header file, which I am confident will work.

>Unless the
>automatic updating tool is extremely clever, I'd probably just use the
>old WIP.

Should be clever enough. At the moment, it understands to rename
function calls (but not method names), declaration types and variables.
It is smart enough to understand 'struct' and 'class', even nested, and
will handle inline functions/constructor initialisers in 'class'.

The only thing it can't handle is major preprocessor trickery (such as
constructing names from arguments, or mismatched braces/quotes within
preprocessor symbols).

I generally agree with what you said, however.

Bye for now,
-- 
Laurence Withers, lwithers@xxxxxxxxxx
                http://www.lwithers.demon.co.uk/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature