[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Henrik Stokseth wrote:
> On Thursday 18 October 2001 02:25, Peter Wang wrote:
>
> > Ok. What about Eric's idea:
> >
> > liballegro.so.4.0 -> liballegro.so.4.0.x
> > liballegro.so.4.2 -> liballegro.so.4.2.x
> >
> > There would be no liballegro.so.4, otherwise we get problems again
> > with binary compatibility between 4.0.x and 4.2.x.
>
> That sounds fine. Not having a liballeg.so.4 will indeed solve the ABI
> problem.
So versions will be major.minor.revision, where major will be changed only
if something BIG changes (architectural redesign as in 3.x -> 4.x), minor
will be changed if ABI compatibility is damaged and revision in the rest
of cases? And of course, 4.0.x is stable and 4.1.x is devel. That's good
for me.
Have a nice day.
Stepan Roh