Re: [AD] Allegro x86 clear and blit optimizations - update

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]



Esaelon@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> however I plan to
> work in and test a MMX-enhanced 32-bit clear before sending.

When I wrote the 32bpp MMX code, it turned out to be 10% slower than the
regular non-MMX one. Perhaps MMX instructions have trouble with getting
data from system RAM instead of L2 cache? Just a guess though.


--
- Robert J Ohannessian

"Microsoft code is probably O(n^20)" (My CS teacher)



Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/