Re: [AD] Allegro x86 clear and blit optimizations - update |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
Esaelon@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> however I plan to
> work in and test a MMX-enhanced 32-bit clear before sending.
When I wrote the 32bpp MMX code, it turned out to be 10% slower than the
regular non-MMX one. Perhaps MMX instructions have trouble with getting
data from system RAM instead of L2 cache? Just a guess though.
--
- Robert J Ohannessian
"Microsoft code is probably O(n^20)" (My CS teacher)