Re: [AD] broken dat and grabber?

Re: [AD] broken dat and grabber?

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: conductors@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [AD] broken dat and grabber?
From: Peter Wang <tjaden@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 23:12:14 +1100

Tom Fjellstrom <tfjellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> I remember the kernel sources saying 2.95.2 isn't 'safe'...

... for the kernel only.  It's a proper release.

-- 
tjaden@xxxxxxxxxx - http://www.psynet.net/tjaden/
Scheme hackers do it, then come back and do it again later.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [AD] broken dat and grabber?
  - From: Tom Fjellstrom

References:
- [AD] broken dat and grabber?
  - From: Tom Fjellstrom
- Re: [AD] broken dat and grabber?
  - From: Peter Wang
- Re: [AD] broken dat and grabber?
  - From: Peter Wang
- Re: [AD] broken dat and grabber?
  - From: Tom Fjellstrom

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] broken dat and grabber?
Next by Date: Re: [AD] broken dat and grabber?
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] broken dat and grabber?
Next by thread: Re: [AD] broken dat and grabber?

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/