Re: [AD] Pentium opt (was: changes in cvs)

Re: [AD] Pentium opt (was: changes in cvs)

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]

To: "AD" <conductors@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [AD] Pentium opt (was: changes in cvs)
From: "Henrik Stokseth" <hstokset@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 07:08:25 +0200
Cc: "Bob" <ohannessian@xxxxxxxxxx>

Bob <ohannessian@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> As long as we're there, why not a PPROONLY option (-march=i686) for PPro
> and up (P2, 3, 4?).

the gain is not much at all...

-henrik

References:
- [AD] changes in cvs.
  - From: Henrik Stokseth
- Re: [AD] Pentium opt (was: changes in cvs)
  - From: Bob

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [AD] Pentium opt (was: changes in cvs)
Next by Date: Re: [AD] New readme.mgw
Previous by thread: Re: [AD] Pentium opt (was: changes in cvs)
Next by thread: RE: [AD] Pentium opt (was: changes in cvs)

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/