| [translations] Re: 2.20.0 release coordination with translation. Other showstoppers? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/translations Archives
]
"Phil Holmes" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> But it doesn't make sense to point VERSION_DEVEL to documentation that
>> is actually older than that of 2.20, does it?
>>
>> I do not really know what is correct here with respect to our
>> semi-automatic webpage update mechanism. I just remember that we had
>> problems last time round.
>>
>> -- David Kastrup
>
>
> I think it needs to point to documentation that actually exists, since
> we won't be building for the development version. There's no reason
> not to launch a 2.21 fairly soon afterwards, and the problem you're
> citing would then go away.
The 2.21 release depends on merging the translation work back in. I
probably should start with that already: we don't have many outstanding
contributions there I guess.
Too bad I never understood how git-rerere is supposed to work.
On 2.21.0 the documentation translations will be outdated. That is
expected. But they need to compile anyway.
--
David Kastrup