| Re: [translations] Re: CG 5.8.3: updating committish of lsr snippets |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/translations Archives
]
- To: Federico Bruni <fedelogy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [translations] Re: CG 5.8.3: updating committish of lsr snippets
- From: Francisco Vila <paconet.org@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 10:59:35 +0100
- Cc: Lily-Devel List <lilypond-devel@xxxxxxx>, LilyPond Translation <translations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=efIN/Omc8X+ympbC9neU/oDaGZkyRpdo6HRrMmJ+yL0=; b=hxucRtzAkdXH0+b1xpNsZhsqJsXFSqspP6eHloR5SCheMGZAbCRDbrOBoNdMwDqynf YSpgZs98h8VUkOTclJ0Gw8PQ/Xv0M+xW+gu/1qMpilUbg3z4YBtHr1QnxXnQVaXlJnJG mU60WY2nWaksrIarvjJxH+fp5i/CyTZVtKB+E=
2011/11/3 Federico Bruni <fedelogy@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On the other hand, I thought (and still think) that the "right committish",
> which keeps tracking information AND gives a terse check-translation output,
> should exist for these files.
Not necesarily, because snippets change. That is where garbage comes
from. You see garbage once, and then if you update the committishes
you should not see that garbage again. You'll see another, different
garbage.
We need a terse output that shows only changes in texidocs and titles.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com