| [translations] CG 5.8.3: updating committish of lsr snippets |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/translations Archives
]
- To: Lily-Devel List <lilypond-devel@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: [translations] CG 5.8.3: updating committish of lsr snippets
- From: Federico Bruni <fedelogy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 12:10:28 +0200
- Cc: LilyPond Translation <translations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RBSiFh32naPVaa61d4CIZLZc8dgVGgDeWh+DbPpQm5s=; b=HP9ROA0ac8WSI5IfvBJcZchBkaBkNXWDl0RcN2ybuhetsUPvC4e0qXYOyx7UBa7se2 IGv27jXbJGwE9ryVMESMGYnBGc41adkHuFvTepcZ7yMOH2Ad12NdxjLaJasnD8JOpqUg pHN4MEayi7NFD/fPXuiMlfV0i49cHiyClqLKM=
Two months ago I discussed with Francisco a problem with committish and
LSR snippets:
http://lilypond-translations.3384276.n2.nabble.com/Doc-it-revision-of-snippets-in-LM-please-backport-to-2-14-td6600646.html
(read last messages in particular)
Information in CG 5.8.3, Updating translation committishes, is Ok for
people who have push access.
For those who haven't, a different method should be recommended.
Otherwise the maintenance scripts will complain about bad objects (non
existing committishes).
In the thread above Francisco proposed a solution.
Please think about what's the best solution and update CG.
Thanks,
Federico