[translations] Re: Links to manuals |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/translations Archives
]
- To: Translations list at lilynet <translations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [translations] Re: Links to manuals
- From: Francisco Vila <paconet.org@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:19:03 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6njSYYzlaLrdwl67RKgWL4n+FiBa3qErK9qVYgAeLes=; b=wh/wNN+lLt8Nz3j0rDNdQKM99NUY3RrP08LYp0QSTxAi+/0r5q2qOSC7OQQdHBvaJZ +vWXSH+fuLWwHAWArht3Hq9FczDraGJxnFhvn/e4FKSP/SRB+XBLFyPNZqjMrer6mPCC 1h6B0I7UD8LRc2Q01qVioJPJHpKF71wnbV9Wc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wuv03TTSX9tmRl8ExLqUJkU4ggHJ0GbeZhZmWCs4bjYtoO7/LTBhTEqD4VzVOrDlO9 Eb5Z4jyrZYHEhc/OM73UKaOufs+509EaujbbG1jI9BdtmdYbFfC6OnDIjKS60soToNoM Nk+RWbPMZ8Dm/oi2EYsJvvsxHwenYRwgPwaBE=
2011/3/30 Francisco Vila <paconet.org@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Hello all,
>
> I am doing a round on web links to manuals to see if I make any sense
> from correspondence of @ref to @node. It is a bit mysterious;
Now it's the turn of
NOTATION MANUAL. I am talking about offline compiled manuals here;
presumably those which will be online when 2.14 launches.
There is no top @node for Notation in either language.
language - link in ll/web/manuals.itexi - leads to HTML page:
[en] - @ifWebLinks{@manualStableNotationSplitNoName,@rusernamed{Top,Notation}}
- notation/index.html#top
cs - @ifWebLinks{@manualStableNotationSplitNoName,@rusernamed{Začátek,Notový
zápis}} - notation/zacatek.cs.html#za_010d_00e1tek *404
de - @ifWebLinks{@manualStableNotationSplitNoName,@rusernamed{Top,Notation}}
- notation/index.de.html#top
es - @ifWebLinks{@manualStableNotationSplitNoName-es,@rusernamed{Top,Notación}}
- notation/arriba.es.html *404
fr - @ifWebLinks{@manualStableNotationSplitNoName-fr,@rusernamed{Top,Notation}}
- notation/index.fr.html#top
hu - @ifWebLinks{@manualStableNotationSplitNoName-hu,@rusernamed{Top,Kottaírás}}
- notation/index.hu.html#top
it - @ifWebLinks{@manualStableNotationSplitNoName,@rusernamed{Top,Notation}}
- notation/su.it.html *404
ja - @ifWebLinks{@manualStableNotationSplitNoName,@rusernamed{Top,記譜法}}
- notation/index.ja.html#top
nl - @ifWebLinks{@manualStableNotationSplitNoName,@rusernamed{Top,Notatie}}
- notation/index.nl.html#top
zh - @ifWebLinks{@manualStableNotationSplitNoName,@rusernamed{Top,Notation}}
- notation/index.zh.html#top
Targets marked (* 404) are wrong. We have three of these, for cs/, es/
and it/. Comments follow:
cs - One could think that Target is taken from 1st arg to @rusernamed,
but that contradicts es/ and it/ cases, both of which have Top here.
es - macro call ends in -es, but so do fr/ and hu/
it - macro call does not end in -it but we have a broken link nevertheless.
It could be that Target base name for HTML is taken from top @node in
ll/web.texi?? Compare my previous message. All three broken cases
here, namely cs/es/it had @node Začátek/Ariba/Su in web.texi,
respectively. Does this make sense?
Could it be that Documentation/po/xx.po files are used to translate
these targets?
For me, the cryptic mechanism that produces all those long macro names
is too prone to this type of errors. One can not grep for node names
or link targets.
web/macros.itexi files look OK. Help!
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com