Re: [tablatures] Re: error in predefined chord diagram? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/tablatures Archives
]
- To: Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [tablatures] Re: error in predefined chord diagram?
- From: Marc Hohl <marc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:09:43 +0100
- Cc: Ronald Hochreiter <ronald@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, lilypond-user Mailinglist <lilypond-user@xxxxxxx>, "tablatures@xxxxxxxxxxx" <tablatures@xxxxxxxxxxx>, David Kastrup <dak@xxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1296720585; l=2325; s=domk; d=hohlart.de; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=AoXj7yURVyt4HljSnqCqFZF7zac=; b=TOhVzMUeZ+oUjU4pt6H/yA0ZopW8shskvhtX/x290TBJk99adE0AVsdyKJdAMFJQoOC tbnA2CjVUgIq6LbUgUYcZIMyzowKU7HbYNsWggkctCzcW7NjeLOG1qQ7NiyPMYs4HVCSt AlZS61yvZqpPP3+4+XEtcChVQ/Ygy41uf3g=
Am 03.02.2011 05:36, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
[...]
a) 1231xx or 1231x1
This is just Edim above up one fret, right?
This could be useful for higher chords:
f:dim 1231x1
fis:dim 2342x2
g:dim 3453x3
gis:dim 4564x4
a:dim 5675x5
bes:dim 6786x6
b:dim 7897x7
b) xx6464 or 4x6464
This fingering for the Fdim seems to be a very versatile fingering that I'd
expect to see used a lot. I know that I'd personaly like it, because it's
relatively easy and consistent:
cis:dim xx2020
d:dim xx3131
ees:dim xx4242
e:dim xx5353
f:dim xx6464
c) x89A9x (A = 10)
This one is also useful
a:dim x0121x
bes:dim x1232x
b:dim x2343x
c:dim x3454x
cis:dim x4565x
d:dim x5676x
ees:dim x6787x
e:dim x7898x
f:dim x89a9x
This gives lots of opportunities for the table below.
I tend to favor diagrams with low fret numbers and muted strings at either
the top or the bottom, rather than in the middle.
Hello Carl, hello guitarists out there ;-)
sorry for joining so late in this discussion - I think that the voicings
b) and c)
are very useful and sound good, whereas these mentioned in a) are way too
complicated to use, and if you use the short form with the lowest four
strings,
they do not sound convincing.
Since I mostly have to use a dim7, I am not sure which voicing would be
more universal, though.
Regards,
Marc
Any recommendations?
Thanks,
Carl
c:dim "x;3-4;1-1;o;1-2;o;"
c:dim7 "x;x;1-1;2-3;1-2;2-4;"
cis:dim "x;4-4;2-3;1-1;2-2;1-1;"
cis:dim7 offset c:dim7 one fret
d:dim
d:dim7 "x;x;o;1-1;o;1-2;"
dis:dim "2-2;o;1-1;2-3;x;2-4;"
dis:dim7 "x;x;1-1;2-3;1-2;2-4;"
e:dim
e:dim7 offset dis:dim7 one fret
f:dim
f:dim7 "x;x;o;1-1;o;1-2;"
fis:dim
fis:dim7 same as dis:dim7
g:dim
g:dim7 "x;x;5-2;6-4;5-3;3-1;"
gis:dim
gis:dim7 same as f:dim7
a:dim
a:dim7 same as ees:dim7
ais:dim
ais:dim7 offset ees:dim7 one fret
b:dim
b:dim7 same as d:dim7
Thanks,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user