Re: [tablatures] separating music and tablature information |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/tablatures Archives
]
- To: Patrick Schmidt <p.l.schmidt@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [tablatures] separating music and tablature information
- From: Marc Hohl <marc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 12:10:35 +0100
- Cc: tablatures@xxxxxxxxxxx, lilypond-user@xxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1267441838; l=1342; s=domk; d=hohlart.de; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=Py/K1VzChBi15zxGXEwIAZ4ka0w=; b=mzb1RvIgvvP92lOczhewXRViVcA3NkSxHCsa0LEktg6RCdw2rLGFbo3fA4AjneToKXw OSbpivSfewZubvuvZvhHgnbW7FExPalxlNB5YnN1LmTQYimbCeqI7sAFKay1Ik3xtTGty j3a3ZUaFl0puIby9VfYLypBOIKFg5sWju5A=
Patrick Schmidt schrieb:
Hi all,
in order to achieve different guitar tablature editions of the same
piece of music I experimented with ghost voices consisting of spacer
rests in combination with tablature information. Unfortunately it
doesn't seem to be possible to use spacer rests in chord constructs
such as <s s s>. In many cases I can use 's' instead and define a
minimum Fret but some chords in higher playing positions contain open
strings such as <a\5 c'\3 b\2 e'\1>. In this case it would be helpful
to be able to use <s\5 s\3 s\2 s\1> in a ghost voice and <a c' b e'>
in the main voice to keep the music and tablature informations in
separate voices. As a workaround I could use <a\5 c'\3 b\2 e'\1> in
the ghost voice and <a c' b e'> in combination with \once \override
TabNoteHead #'stencil = ##f in the main voice because otherwise the
string number indications in the ghost voice interfere with the
automatic string calculation in the main voice. But then the ghost
voice also contains some note names and durations which I wanted to
avoid. Is there a more elegant solution to this problem?
To be honest: I don't fully understand your request, sorry.
Why do you need something like <s\5 s\3 s\2 s\1>?
Can you post a minimal example for clarification?
Thanks,
Marc