Re: [tablatures] transposing tablature

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lilynet.net/tablatures Archives ]


-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 20:47:50 -0700
> Von: Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx>
> An: Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx>, Patrick Schmidt <p.l.schmidt@xxxxxx>, "tablatures@xxxxxxxxxxx" <tablatures@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Betreff: Re: [tablatures] transposing tablature

> 
> 
> 
> On 1/8/10 7:50 PM, "Carl Sorensen" <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On 1/8/10 12:05 PM, "Patrick Schmidt" <p.l.schmidt@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> >> First of all I propose to have transposable tablature because in my
> opinion
> >> this function is helpful but does not exist, yet. Let me demonstrate
> the
> >> problem:
> >> 
> >> What happens in tablature when you transpose a 5-note c major common
> chord in
> >> first position to D major?
> >> 
> >> \version "2.13.10"
> >> music = { <c e g c e>1 }
> >> \score {
> >>         <<
> >>           \new Staff = "1" <<
> >>           \transpose c d {\relative c' {\music }}
> >>>> 
> >> 
> >>           \new TabStaff = "Tab 1" <<
> >>           \transpose c d {\relative c {\music }}
> >>>>         
> >>>> 
> >> }
> >> 
> >> You get an inverted 4-note d major (sixth) chord in first position. The
> root
> >> of the former c major chord got lost in transposition by default
> because the
> >> root of the resulting d major chord would be on the fifth fret of the
> fifth
> >> string. LilyPond tries to find the corresponding pitches in the first
> four
> >> frets of the guitar because the default value of minimumFret is zero.
> In my
> >> opinion this behaviour is wrong because not all the pitches of the new
> chord
> >> can be found in first position.
> > 
> > This is a bug.  Minimum fret should not default to zero.  It should
> default
> > to unset, and the code should be able to find the correct chord.
> > 
> > I had missed this problem before in your code.  I apologize for not
> > understanding it.
> > 
No need to apologize, it was my fault.
> > I think I can fix this bug.  I'll try to get to it in the next couple of
> > hours.
Thanks very much!
> 
> Patrick,
> 
> Can you add a FretBoards context and do some experimenting to see if the
> chords transpose properly in the FretBoards context?
Work in progress
> 
> For the particular case you gave, the FretBoards function works properly.
> 
> If the FretBoards function works properly to give the tablature you want,
> I'll adjust the tab-note-head engraver so it uses the same note-to-fret
> function that the FretBoards engraver uses.
> 
> I think this is the proper thing to have happen, anyway.
Sounds good to me. By the way: Would you mind me adding (quite) a few fret diagrams to predefined-fretboards.ly? If yes: is it possible to add several diagrams of the same chord e.g. C major: A-shape (III. position), G-shape (V. position), E-shape (VIII. position) and D-shape (X. position). I could also add lots of inverted chords, eleventh, thirteenth and so on. Why are there two separate fretboard files?

patrick

P.S.: I always get two identical e-mails from you (but not from the others). I thought the mailing list prevents "double postings"?!
> 
> Here's my sample code:
> 
> \version "2.13.10"
> music = { <c e g c e>1 }
> \score {
>         <<
>           \new FretBoards {
>             \transpose c d {\relative c {\music}}
>           }
>           \new Staff = "1" <<
>           \transpose c d {\relative c' {\music }}
>           >>
> 
>           \new TabStaff = "Tab 1" <<
> %          \set TabStaff.minimumFret = #2
>           \transpose c d {\relative c {\music }}
>           >>
>         >>
> }
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Carl
> 
> 

-- 
Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3.5 -
sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/atbrowser



Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/