| Re: [tablatures] tie bug in 2.13.10? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/tablatures Archives
]
- To: J_ames <james.lowe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [tablatures] tie bug in 2.13.10?
- From: Marc Hohl <marc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 09:38:53 +0100
- Cc: tablatures@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1263631134; l=1119; s=domk; d=hohlart.de; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=3H4/el+CMVkNFZ0HeEP85LtvgXQ=; b=M4cmyQiJLCpgL6XzVGsbrqMsDcT/BYJZryX2unlgM331fB+KckRxt9rTvpHDDl4vXa5 IFliNALC6Wa2ifBb+WVc9Rom61v5omX+ige9WEIVojBDysclb/ggrX5TJ1sZR0Gvkn9UC UP1mYqsFzmeT5ma3PV1IWlyHvXWhQJ+5k3o=
J_ames schrieb:
Hello,
My name is James and I have been tasked by Graham Percival (who has been
mentoring me in regards to Documentation of LilyPond) to ask about a
requested document change by Federico concerning the tab-example.ly file.
Reading this thread it seems to me that as of today \include bend.ly would
be appropriate however there are plans to add this to the 'core engraver' so
that when 2.14 is out there will be no need for this include file.
Is this right/true/still in the air etc?
I am currently working on this, but still struggling with the basics...
I don't know when 2.14 will be released, but I hope things go fast enough
to have a proper implementation of bends, so bend.ly will not appear in
any release.
Marc
I'd just like to get this straight so I don't do unnecessary patching of
documentation.
Thanks for your time
James
Carl Sorensen schrieb:
This is used in bend.ly, which has alpha status, and since we
want to do bends by a new engraver, I don't think it makes
sense to enhance this file.