| Re: [frogs] Re: New frog in an empty pond? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/frogs Archives
]
- To: Pavel Roskin <proski@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [frogs] Re: New frog in an empty pond?
- From: Neil Puttock <n.puttock@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:37:02 +0000
- Authentication-results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of n.puttock@xxxxxxxxx designates 10.204.130.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=n.puttock@xxxxxxxxx; dkim=pass header.i=n.puttock@xxxxxxxxx
- Cc: Janek Warchol <janek.lilypond@xxxxxxxxx>, frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cVM6lCMXOWQL+8r3W2xXWdYcrdBccj5clZ2AUgwfEkw=; b=UsN6WdVsKyoDWnUEFGJfhFQnPJRhDq3LyP6iZY5IGxqrHb2q1TF7ft5zu+a2jiM5Xb Mk8NnjHTQWmZotgxo2rcXZCyfr//EXB26tnIwivauxYx4HujKqNKZ6P4HJh6DKOeu1Go 8E5vQ5SzIVoJV/Dtwi6c1AKAqH9nx4QmiH3o0=
On 23 February 2012 15:18, Pavel Roskin <proski@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> I actually wanted to make a stopgap solution in Scheme. I wrote some code
> that looks for other stems and sets the stem length so it would touch the
> stem above (attached). But the code is unreliable. Some stems are not
> calculated yet.
I'd love to be proven wrong, but I don't think you'll have much
success with this approach. At the very least, you'll need a Scheme
engraver at the correct context level to collect the stems at the
right time. If a simple length override were possible with the
current infrastructure, we wouldn't need a Span_arpeggio_engraver to
typeset cross-staff arpeggios.
Cheers,
Neil
--
----
Join the Frogs!