| Re: [frogs] indenting scheme code |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/frogs Archives
]
- To: Valentin Villenave <valentin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [frogs] indenting scheme code
- From: Graham Percival <graham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 00:23:19 -0700
- Cc: lilypond-devel@xxxxxxx, frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=MqtE+OdwkA+MIOqiHosFSMVt2v8=; b=s21a 6VuSnaAY33rzw6TbBSYM9tTZ4vuHiREdT280hCQ18wjRwLDrVcc+SaDep16dwOOJ mquMGfksS+2Sm0nDgCwR/JUNKsZYdD1sgbMJFhQjkjaCa8i9/btlL6QIAbZuHygG QXIu1sUM3PprrIUkh1no1viLkPYSrsiEauIdGTo=
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 09:04:55AM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:22 AM, Graham Percival
> <graham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Anybody interested in writing / modifying a scheme script to
> > indent scheme files? This is a much easier problem than C++ code.
>
> No trolling intended (and I know this has been extensively discussed
> before), but doesn't GNU Emacs do an excellent job at it?
I'm interested in whether anybody is willing to do this task. The
GOP-PROP will come later.
I personally think that asking people to download 40 megabytes of
emacs to do a task which can be done in a 100-line scheme file is
a bit silly.
> > I've found standalone scripts for PLT Racket and common lisp:
> > http://evalwhen.com/scmindent/index.html
> > I think that they need some minor tweaking to make them run in
> > guile, but I can't imagine it being a huge task. This could be an
> > ideal introduction to guile.
>
> Is that something "we" want to distribute? If so, how should "we"
> proceed on the licensing front?
I hadn't thought of that, but I would imagine that the author
would be willing to place it under BSD or GPLv3.
Or perhaps it may be possible to convert the emacs guile-indent
elisp thing into guile. I'd assume that this would be under GPLv2
or v3, but obviously we'd need to check.
Cheers,
- Graham
---
----
Join the Frogs!