[frogs] Re: Eyeglasses (was Re: -dbackend=svg ... warning: missing stencil expression `embedded-ps') |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/frogs Archives
]
- To: Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: [frogs] Re: Eyeglasses (was Re: -dbackend=svg ... warning: missing stencil expression `embedded-ps')
- From: Patrick McCarty <pnorcks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 12:16:29 -0700
- Cc: Neil Puttock <n.puttock@xxxxxxxxx>, "lilypond-user@xxxxxxx" <lilypond-user@xxxxxxx>, lily-devel <lilypond-devel@xxxxxxx>, Lilypond Frogs List <frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uaXEqeys5voAb+NQFyxeZqjmM5lILFP3K0A2E2cj5pw=; b=gO8T8jvSco9QDOnwW7gw4K0Ht/lR+cTu0a0n9Bc7G3pbvilXOoS7+N5+COqC3b4Fnm ZqfRqpPF43CAT3tUKTP+kTtS9kQy54MuvUFv1Rr8O4nOxvM4f5xc9rVvOmXOmM5f0Tmg owX/m7ZGE+5LPaABxMHd56b0/LABs0ppu82ys=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=W7l3GLu2Cv1stjzDCjP+8DX0KA+wnSp05bDDwj9myRzM7UGspRDkTW2Vaieo17xUot 3CwwaWHxhIrsbtMSKkGnBq1iUV4J6S8TT6VkHyW8ycVOZIQ/wNjIdldzmW5fXy11KWcW Ktei7Rrz/EmeqKRjShbVAifwHongmDECb9djQ=
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 6/6/10 7:36 AM, "Neil Puttock" <n.puttock@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> 2010/6/4 Patrick McCarty <pnorcks@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>>> Another option is to use the 'path routine. This isn't documented yet
>>> and is a little cumbersome to use, but you can find an example that
>>> uses 'path in this snippet:
>>>
>>> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=623
>>
>> I see \eyeglasses uses make-postscript-markup; I guess it should be
>> rewritten using 'path (or ideally, implemented as a glyph).
>> Unfortunately it uses `arc' to create the lenses, which will be a pain
>> to approximate using curveto (the usual suggestion being four bezier
>> quadrants as a fair approximation. :)
>
> I'd be happy to add it as a glyph. I've got enough experience in the fonts
> now with my work on shape notes that it wouldn't take long.
>
> However, I think there's some value in having something in the distribution
> that uses 'path, because that's an easy way for users to add new shapes.
I think that using 'path would be the better option, also the circles
and semicircle will be a little tricky to code.
> So I'd like to propose that we have the task of changing \eyeglasses from
> make-postscript-markup to 'path be a Frog task.
To make everything easier, we should probably add a new markup
command, \path, so that we can use `make-path-markup' when redefining
\eyeglasses.
Thanks,
Patrick
---
----
Join the Frogs!