| Re: [frogs] Could a frog spend 20 min to help cellist's thumb? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/frogs Archives
]
- To: Neil Puttock <n.puttock@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [frogs] Could a frog spend 20 min to help cellist's thumb?
- From: Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:11:57 -0600
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Cc: Frédéric Bron <frederic.bron@xxxxxxx>, Xavier Scheuer <x.scheuer@xxxxxxxxx>, Lilypond Frogs List <frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Thread-index: AcrjMk8TUF+qyFfAQ7mJ2gzMUTSkVgAMfh0x
- Thread-topic: [frogs] Could a frog spend 20 min to help cellist's thumb?
On 4/23/10 4:13 PM, "Neil Puttock" <n.puttock@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2010/4/22 Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx>:
>
>> Is there a regression test for thumb scripts?
>
> No, but why should there be? It's just a bog-standard Script: there
> are no features unique to \thumb which mark it out as a special case
> amongst the articulations.
My only reason for thinking there should be is that we had a bug because the
thumb script had improper settings. Now we've fixed it. If somebody makes
a change in the future we ought to see it in the regression tests somewhere..
Thanks,
Carl
---
----
Join the Frogs!