| Re: [frogs] Could a frog spend 20 min to help cellist's thumb? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/frogs Archives
]
- To: Neil Puttock <n.puttock@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [frogs] Could a frog spend 20 min to help cellist's thumb?
- From: Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:06:22 -0600
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Cc: Frédéric Bron <frederic.bron@xxxxxxx>, Xavier Scheuer <x.scheuer@xxxxxxxxx>, Lilypond Frogs List <frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Thread-index: AcrhmFQhZvxcBItOS/aWlGegsXMa2AAx1T2w
- Thread-topic: [frogs] Could a frog spend 20 min to help cellist's thumb?
On 4/21/10 3:19 PM, "Neil Puttock" <n.puttock@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2010/4/20 Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx>:
>
>> When the behavior has changed, a regression test should be created or
>> modified so that the new behavior is demonstrated. That way, if a change in
>> the future causes it to break, we'll know about it.
>
> I think in this case it's unnecessary: there's already a regression
> test which tests #'avoid-slur = #'around, so there's little to be
> gained by duplicating its behaviour.
Is there a regression test for thumb scripts?
Carl
---
----
Join the Frogs!