| Re: [frogs] CG chapter 3, first draft |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/frogs Archives
]
- To: Graham Percival <graham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [frogs] CG chapter 3, first draft
- From: Mark Polesky <markpolesky@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:17:17 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1264205837; bh=NFGJWs9J0k6ijWEbgAsrFZys3MoKe0Ov8iRPFOWKgAQ=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ieL2lmAEsMoXyZBeKHEKDFwaxT1SpPqTkcKgrUrEBFgm3sPUY4iGkXcOPPM5Pd3Tn/ppCiVyu/sfzJ7y561Ap7c7NVZm7drhRpcl/7wAcnz6Gtx5fJpFnNXLO0DmGBX0kfqKF1DNRLnKTirSBs8q+1gVCYM4WRiThqDMKHTK33c=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FfwtVJdzLagD8xrp7F3hPqvj4SyxQZi7LUEREGa1dWGYyhEtEubteB9TJFuDKsPgzIAvkdSPXDEfo0q5HAiy7Oe5sjKZ0Nmi2jB0GmdALmjjv6QqyaWzLwqZQ0aEGJM6aq2hRHcpVkKJq6JD0osU3vaFYTlmkZwtR9DUsEwGU/o=;
The links:
http://www.markpolesky.com/norobots/compiling_new.itexi
http://www.markpolesky.com/norobots/compiling_new.itexi.html
Graham Percival wrote:
> I use
> tar -xjf lilypond-x.y.z-a.tar.bz2
> for the tar.gz (do we even distribute those?), you'd
> change the j to a z.
As far as I know, we *only* distribute those. Where do you
see a lilypond[*].tar.bz2 file?
>> Okay, I changed "you need to run" to "you should run".
>
> well... ok. Even that's not true, but it's easier than
> explaining "if some time has passed since the last time
> you ran ./configure or ./autogen.sh, then run
> ./configure".
Isn't it a good idea to run it before your first compile?
How is that not true?
>>> BTW, ./configure is *known* to not check all doc
>>> requirements. A warning here would definitely be
>>> appropriate.
>
> I mean, yes, it *should* issue a warning, but it doesn't
> for some doc-building requirements.
Okay.
> " To build with multiple CPUs, add -jX to the command,
> where X is one more than the number of cores you have.
> For examine, a typical Core2Duo machine would use:
>
> make -j3 "
Added.
>>> 3.6.2
>>>
>>> sweet mao, we don't want people running doc-clean!!!
>>
>> Why not? You make it sound like there's something I
>> don't know. Something that should be mentioned,
>> perhaps...
>
> It forces a complete rebuild, thereby taking 30 minutes to
> 3 hours, instead of 1-2 minutes to only generate the
> changed stuff.
Boy, I wish that had been made clear to me earlier! I've
started a new thread on -devel to clarify these sorts of
things:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-01/msg00516.html
- Mark
---
----
Join the Frogs!