| Re: [frogs] Re: format-mark-* Was: \set vs \override |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/frogs Archives
]
- To: Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [frogs] Re: format-mark-* Was: \set vs \override
- From: Valentin Villenave <v.villenave@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 21:03:55 +0100
- Cc: Mats Bengtsson <mats.bengtsson@xxxxxxxxx>, "lilypond-user@xxxxxxx" <lilypond-user@xxxxxxx>, "frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=YMCqSchzsfjdqaQEedML188AHn1tguhJxBSSbWeMiVg=; b=YeE7xoZ4WpNu78rY1V0Av3HMwn1nrTLlgwv4tqSirOOmac1waDwxQ/TCZxJy4bqT1B MyHRF6PPD+nJBc9ibWStVA4NB07ar4syYh9EMmcvYQADs08pyl8D5oDagHG1uisFuBLT hUJ+UvACTPH5hHweClamcX5aj0Lk0G9oQWgaM=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Jzr/K2HAiV9G+ZamJrGzqpkmgxnarQ0QUC3/O4asVqBMCKc5+MhRGZF1F4j+1cJZJl 6wD5d0k8jlAZ6lHK50zjlz7DYPLVC/EN4uwBSGMWXIsOnvIR7BefFP6Fq5y/y6jgFOLb NNPrWRTeedJup0zQ6yLU/8Ikn7sQ6K7QFwDzs=
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Doing this right probably means a careful explanation of a few of these in
> the NR, and an appendix showing all of the possibilities.
I was about to suggest something like that, but aren't appendices
automatically generated? How would you implement that?
Cheers,
Valentin
---
----
Join the Frogs!