Re: [frogs] Scheme debugging and tracing |
[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lilynet.net/frogs Archives ]
Hi Reinhold, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: I was using 0.02 (much hacked). You chose a much more elegant way of implementing the other voice/staff types than me, so Im upgrading my scores to use 0.03+.Am Donnerstag, 16. April 2009 schrieb Ian Hulin:I want to use this as I've been seeing if I can add some of the TODO's in Reinhold's orchestrallily package. (I've already managed to add stuff like Tabstaff and RhythmicStaff processing, but I've got to the stage where having a Scheme debug setup would be good.)What version of orchestrallily are you using? In the latest version (I just noticed I have never officially released any new version after 0.02), I've already included them, in addition to some other fixes: http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/orchestrallily The git repository at http://repo.or.cz/w/orchestrallily.git (that's the web- frontend), which can be checked out by git clone git://repo.or.cz/orchestrallily.git already has the latest changes. The documentation is now done with texinfo, too. I had begun looking at the polyphonic staff. Where exactly in the new code do you set the equivalent of \voiceOne \voiceTwo etc? I can't see it in the version of orchestrallily I pulled using git. Also shouldn't there be a check to ensure that you're only trying to put a maximum of four voices on one of these staves, as lily only goes up to \voiceFour? Cheers, Ian Apart from that, yes, I agree some better Scheme debugging help would definitely be useful! Cheers, Reinhold |
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ | http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/ |