Re: [frogs] Re: patch for bug 729

["Carl D. Sorensen" <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx>]

On 2/28/09 3:43 PM, "John Mandereau" <john.mandereau@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Carl,
> Carl D. Sorensen a écrit :
>> So, just for the record, I guess that the appropriate way to handle this
>> would be to:
>> 
>> 1.  Search through input/lsr for relevant files.
>> 2.  Fix the snippet to make sure it compiles properly.
>> 3.  Copy the snippet to input/new
>> 4.  Delete the snippet from input/lsr
>> 
>> Is that right?
>>  
> Yes, except you shouldn't do 4, and don't forget some snippets
> eventually come from LSR, not from input/new.

We can't do anything about the snippets that come from LSR, can we?  They're
for the old release, so they can't be updated, IIUC.

I thought that was why we had input/new, to handle snippets that had changed
syntax from the currently-running LSR.



> 
>> Plus, I guess that something like these needs to go into the CG, so that we
>> never have to have this conversation on -devel again.  And the frogs don't
>> have to search the frogs archive either.
>>  
> I added the fixing procedure you mentioned above, plus other LSR-related
> stuff in the CG.

Thanks, John!

Carl


---

----
Join the Frogs!