| Re: [frogs] Re: patch for bug 729 |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/frogs Archives
]
- To: frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [frogs] Re: patch for bug 729
- From: John Mandereau <john.mandereau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:43:35 +0100
- Cc: Graham Percival <graham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, lilypond-devel <lilypond-devel@xxxxxxx>, Mats Bengtsson <mats.bengtsson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=52j8w+aID/8Dj/99cGvaCwNG0jjIdGW+Ews98JApWS4=; b=ww9VYiPpO6lWa9vABJa3iw3UGVkBesAdfo/955wp56NUly8jGVHrLX0sIcB6NcwBA4 iT1Oa6sfLB02vCP3dE2j+DHDgv6xLAt8YDA72/Tirzzn7ev9YmPXcHCt+UrIGR439KQJ N5+NYTslfG7HOSI0AolP968swEkboEGjenDrQ=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZoGW/B0gL3BCrj0QbuoAZ9SlKPo8QpeAtNfyIMh9lsfCFIOWyCQtPDy88vxjAJ6/JA HOnsJnGhSKxVmwE/GZUEwcAOsbPMWR7dCnadAzmnl77Mq6+j+trPz/RfVAWMREBxRCMM GtPiLRuiPojEG0/9tCUZq2gK199MbhdYeYdUQ=
Hi Carl,
Carl D. Sorensen a écrit :
So, just for the record, I guess that the appropriate way to handle this
would be to:
1. Search through input/lsr for relevant files.
2. Fix the snippet to make sure it compiles properly.
3. Copy the snippet to input/new
4. Delete the snippet from input/lsr
Is that right?
Yes, except you shouldn't do 4, and don't forget some snippets
eventually come from LSR, not from input/new.
Plus, I guess that something like these needs to go into the CG, so that we
never have to have this conversation on -devel again. And the frogs don't
have to search the frogs archive either.
I added the fixing procedure you mentioned above, plus other LSR-related
stuff in the CG.
Cheers,
John
---
----
Join the Frogs!