| Re: [frogs] Status on Identifier Documentation Project |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/frogs Archives
]
- To: "frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <frogs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [frogs] Status on Identifier Documentation Project
- From: "Carl D. Sorensen" <c_sorensen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:22:52 -0700
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Thread-index: Acl2o/kAInSQGgt7T2qAOKDTdF4j1QAA240q
- Thread-topic: [frogs] Status on Identifier Documentation Project
Thanks Marek.
I'm sorry I missed your contribution. As I said, I sent out the email
because of my poor record keeping.
On 1/14/09 4:57 PM, "Marek Klein" <marek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Carl,
> I have send you my patches on 3th of january. You responded on 6th. In your
> respond you mentioned:
>
>>> Would you please update the docstring, wait for me to work out with John
>>> whether we will use _i or _idoc, and then resubmit the patch?
>
> What is the result of your discussion?
We will use _i right now. I think I will eventually switch it to _idoc, but
Frogs should use _i.
Thanks,
Carl
---
----
Join the Frogs!