Re: [chrony-users] Sources marked as falseticker which shouldn't be

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More chrony.tuxfamily.org/chrony-users Archives ]


On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 06:12:53PM +0800, Yuezhen LUAN wrote:
> But some of the chrony clients also mark B as falseticker, some marked B as
> combined, some marked B as selectable but not combined, and all chrony
> clients select C as current time source.
> 
> Offset between B and C are small enough(currently 200us~300us). According
> to selection algorithm, I think B shouldn't be falseticker?  'chronyc
> selectdata -a -v' shows like this:
> 
> [image: chronyc_selectdata.png]

That output shows that the sources A and B don't have any overlap in
their intervals and both overlap with C. This is a corner case in the
chrony selection algorithm that IIRC is handled differently than in
ntpd.

That overlap between A and C is only about 30 microseconds. A small
difference in the network delay, timestamping, etc could cause that
overlap to disappear, which would make make B lose the falseticker
status. That will also happen if A drifts further away from B and C.

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar


-- 
To unsubscribe email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
with "unsubscribe" in the subject.
For help email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
with "help" in the subject.
Trouble?  Email listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.


Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/