Re: [chrony-users] setserial low_latency - is it necessary?

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More chrony.tuxfamily.org/chrony-users Archives ]


Many thanks for clarifying!

Sviatoslav

On Monday, June 17th, 2024 at 3:02 AM, Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 08:22:03PM +0000, Sviatoslav Feshchenko wrote:
> 
> > - Is the 1PPS signal buffered if "low_latency" is NOT set?
> 
> 
> I don't think it is. It should trigger the interrupt immediately.
> 
> > - Is it necessary to configure the serial port for "low_latency" if 1PPS signal is available on the DCD pin, when the goal is to maximize the accuracy of the 1PPS signal?
> 
> 
> For PPS it shouldn't matter. Easy to verify. Plot the raw offset from
> the refclocks log, switch the low_latency flag, and see if there are
> any jumps or changes in stability.
> 
> --
> Miroslav Lichvar
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> with "unsubscribe" in the subject.
> For help email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> with "help" in the subject.
> Trouble? Email listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

--
To unsubscribe email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with "unsubscribe" in the subject.
For help email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with "help" in the subject.
Trouble?  Email listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.


Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/