| [chrony-users] 答复: Why is it not selecting servers |
[ Thread Index | Date Index | More chrony.tuxfamily.org/chrony-users Archives ]
|
Can you look at your client configuration and server configuration? I think the smaller the stratum value, the higher the priority of the clock source, 发件人: MUZZULINI Frank [mailto:Frank.MUZZULINI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Hi, This one really puzzles me: MS Name/IP address Stratum Poll Reach LastRx Last sample
=============================================================================== =x 192.168.42.1 11 5 367 38 +63.5s[ +63.5s] +/- 121us =x 192.168.42.2 11 6 377 78 +58.2s[ +58.2s] +/- 42us =x 192.168.42.3 11 7 0 799 +79.2s[ +79.2s] +/- 110us =x 192.168.42.4 11 8 0 84m +112.2s[+112.2s] +/- 112us ^x 172.16.253.1 2 10 377 1010 +835ms[ +835ms] +/- 8853us ^x 10.26.59.11 1 9 377 212 +836ms[ +836ms] +/- 859us ^x 10.26.59.12 1 8 377 194 +836ms[ +836ms] +/- 909us ^x 10.26.59.13 1 8 377 22 +836ms[ +836ms] +/- 838us There are four server that agree on the correct time. There are also two peers which are free running just like the machine itself. Why is it not selecting one of the servers? Using stratum 11 to synchronise peers amongst each other when the uplink is down is normal practice, isn’t it? (It didn’t seem to work here neither, but this may have a good reason, these are test-VMs and they may have
done wild things...) But that should not stop it from going back to the uplink servers, when they are available. Note that the uplink servers are configured dynamically via DHCP, there are not listed in the initstepslew. In fact when I restarted the daemon, it failed to start at all. OS is RHEL 8.6, chrony 4.1 Regards, Frank -- Frank Muzzulini Product Expert MHS FREQUENTIS COMSOFT GmbH Wachhausstr.
5a, 76227 Karlsruhe, Germany Fax: +49 721 9497-129 E-Mail:
frank.muzzulini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Geschäftsführer:
Constantin von Reden Sitz der Gesellschaft: Karlsruhe, HRB 724029, Amtsgericht Mannheim |
| Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ | http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/ |