| Re: [chrony-users] Comparing timekeeping performance with chronyd to ntpd |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More chrony.tuxfamily.org/chrony-users Archives
]
On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 11:01:28AM -0700, Bill Unruh wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Here are some measurements I did with a RPI and other hardware:
> > >
> > > https://fedorapeople.org/~mlichvar/ntpserver/
>
> There does not seem to be any indication on this page of which of the
> situation were chrony and which an ntp implimentation.
There were no tests with ntpd. It was more about testing the
hardware, drivers and timestamping. With the PPS refclock and
server using user/kernel timestamps in the basic mode, I'd expect the
difference in clock control between chronyd and ntpd to be smaller
than the timestamping jitter.
--
Miroslav Lichvar
--
To unsubscribe email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with "unsubscribe" in the subject.
For help email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with "help" in the subject.
Trouble? Email listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.