Re: [chrony-users] chrony and ntpd xleave interoperability

[Rob Janssen <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> The bug in the interleaved mode is a bit more subtle. The state is
> updated from received packet, but only when one of the timestamps is
> zero (i.e. it's the first packet of the association). This means two
> ntpd 4.2.8p10 can interoperate, but I suspect the association will not
> recover if there is a mismatch between the receive timestamps.

I have seen problems like that, and stopped using symmetric peering.
As far as I know, just declaring "server" in each direction works OK (there is loop-detection code)
and appears a lot more stable.  Probably and debugged tested better.

Rob


--
To unsubscribe email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with "unsubscribe" in the subject.
For help email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with "help" in the subject.
Trouble?  Email listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.