| Re: [chrony-users] Possible to get sub-millisecond accuracy? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More chrony.tuxfamily.org/chrony-users Archives
]
- To: chrony-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [chrony-users] Possible to get sub-millisecond accuracy?
- From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 15:01:27 +0200
- Authentication-results: ext-mx03.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
- Authentication-results: ext-mx03.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mlichvar@xxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 1B40380503
- Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 1B40380503
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 07:31:24AM -0700, Denny Page wrote:
> A great deal depends upon the server side ntp implementation which is why I asked which device he was using. I have several ntp devices under test, including one that also supports ptp. While quite accurate in the service of ptp, it's service of ntp has errors of up to 3ms. I have been working with the vendor on the issue.
Beside the LeoNTP unit, are there any NTP devices using their current
firmware versions that you would recommend?
--
Miroslav Lichvar
--
To unsubscribe email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with "unsubscribe" in the subject.
For help email chrony-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with "help" in the subject.
Trouble? Email listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.