| Re: [chrony-dev] [RFC] Transparent fallback from NTP reference clock to RTC |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More chrony.tuxfamily.org/chrony-dev Archives
]
- To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [chrony-dev] [RFC] Transparent fallback from NTP reference clock to RTC
- From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 15:26:32 +0200
- Cc: chrony-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1751462802; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ZEVKw8vFQFs9QZMgGrdhJ0W3yE6jKe9jaRmNw7/IxC0=; b=S63LqPn4OJ1zn2aY+iX7blfqpqbKcbKDisos91fYkyzVVGZmLCf2yxV1KEEArSX20ByPzZ dQ+40kkWBPNGxn+cdmo7DLhSfEs4djpq4vQHdCC02Jq34twPBr3TQ8Y7Omc8PrJ8AZ7Y7L oWr8s7qEn/FF30mD7H9wjz3yTIvb7dk=
On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 03:15:19PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Do you think it can make sense to set STA_UNSYNC in chrony when NTP is
> unreachable in some situations or should rtcsync be just refused always
> in favor of rtcfile when RTC local refclock is used?
The latter makes more sense to me.
--
Miroslav Lichvar
--
To unsubscribe email chrony-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe" in the subject.
For help email chrony-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with "help" in the subject.
Trouble? Email listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.