| [Sawfish] Comparison of extensible window managers. |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/sawfish Archives
]
- To: sawfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Sawfish] Comparison of extensible window managers.
- From: Teika Kazura <teika@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 16:49:30 +0900 (JST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=lavabit.com; b=Wdym3sIGNCNJgim7kHSgzqw3pnP7ApQIM/jmovVjSC9HMJaDS2klNMozqvM0ADrZvCRfgh1uMsCGmrguKOVxf3VIRLqCpWtDgPKsBmVTaOQ/bGMXfxloF/LY4dSzgQ02so41HbszR71uF1GzBjZ0dz/6b2biiAcSjbcUv8jxOB4=; h=Date:Message-Id:To:Subject:From:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
Hi, dear Sawfish users.
Recently I've coined the word "extensible window managers". It
should've been invented long before, but unfortunately I may be the
first.
Anyway Sawfish is the first of the category. Then StumpWM appeared,
and recently Awesome and Xmonad have some popularity.
I think it's worth comparing them, so I created a page for it:
http://sawfish.wikia.com/wiki/Comparison_of_extensible_window_managers
What's the features that make Sawfish superior to them? If you know
any which is missing in that page, please tell us. Once we're well
equipped, I'm going to ask other extensible WM's community.
# I've written a bit in Wikipedia, too, and tried to put a link to
# that page, but external links to wiki pages without good history are
# automatically reverted. It's reasonable.
Teika (Teika kazura)
---
--
Sawfish ML