[eigen] Code coverage and templates

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives ]

To: eigen <eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [eigen] Code coverage and templates
From: Gael Guennebaud <gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 10:59:16 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=t5sqgchBOlu70dCTClA0H2fLP00N+iv+W/U562F4+us=; b=VgWxqFxhFFkTPslDCMB9S1kG3qE5aAzC1PKcnJRzsOABzea6ryItjs3WWCfcZoBDO4 8FORtIOhMOTdAfgNwGt7t/x0X14RQn14k63ryN5tydifh4SEPNxnznBZzogOVyciYS3Q Bjxya4GH1MhGivbXsDIQSp8aFB6LJrcFqWfj7AOmB66xyP6qMprPv7BgTyMC0tLYPDY3 Nui9o+aSlC6EQSbkEdKF7JCAeEJ1Wmh8sYfVMg6eDUvVKA3c9NFRfp6QSexeQbi9tIXt ebrC3unT1KoputOOcwBJy63MQJdSBKpPUR4wlPcoongd2+GywSilSzibXPeASrkzJ1fN OQxw==

Hi,

does anyone know how to get better code coverage outputs from gcov in the case of inlining and templates? In particular, we should find a way to include *all* functions. For instance, the specialization of Block<SparseMatrix> included a few un-tested and un-compiled functions even though gcov returns a coverage of 100%. See:

http://manao.inria.fr/CDash/viewCoverageFile.php?buildid=17299&fileid=282195

lines 169-187. Incidentally, some of these functions were broken...

thanks,

gael

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [eigen] Code coverage and templates
  - From: Christoph Hertzberg

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: [eigen] Scalar operation
Next by Date: Re: [eigen] Scalar operation
Previous by thread: Re: [eigen] Scalar operation
Next by thread: Re: [eigen] Code coverage and templates

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/