| Re: [eigen] Important: Relicensing Eigen to MPL2 |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] Important: Relicensing Eigen to MPL2
- From: Christian Mayer <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:28:18 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=38zKKgNKbTLKVAOu/riOs8SynlrlgouWT6hqfhn0S5Q=; b=HGX1atpN9bIrWmPIlrx5RSLk+3JD77iKti/X5wvk0A/7lHmJgp8W6oXVU14sK8oYJY 2dkYzaZmLKYMy9FOQ63joVad9+xZq5yUys40uhn1RQbSffhez4SnZhKZw1sz++Nj1Iyz zJmRBgVR85vBsFwdidAOL1T/zdCGsWWlA24gg=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Am 16.01.2012 04:02, schrieb Benoit Jacob:
> 1. Would you agree to a MPL2 relicensing of the code you've
> contributed to Eigen? a) no b) yes
I don't know if I contributed a line or only comments. But assuming I
have: I agree.
> 2. Would you personally consider such a MPL2 relicensing of Eigen
> a good or a bad thing? f) Don't know
>
> 3. Which of the following courses of action would you consider the
> best choice for Eigen? a) Keep current LGPL3+/GPL2+ license b)
> Relicense to MPL2 c) Relicense to a liberal license (MIT/BSD). d)
> Relicense to some other license (please elaborate).
I'd love to see the Boost license.
(In my opinion Eigen is valuable, that it should become part of Boost!)
CU,
Chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREIAAYFAk8UXjIACgkQoWM1JLkHou3jcgCeN+E3kKRtZz5/m7EjQxZ2SA41
A+4An0uUJOya7ZQ2Z1tiRUhxNNczuz7O
=/OZd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----