| Re: [eigen] 3.0.4 coming soon, testing appreciated |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] 3.0.4 coming soon, testing appreciated
- From: Rhys Ulerich <rhys.ulerich@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:23:21 -0600
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yUWXm4rF9lBdGRWmmYQw97/HNWfohRGxSCCE9O8+suY=; b=mPIM32Lwaa9/lcAgGnVYeFo2VecYhKxadANPlfB3tQMwSoX/ZBoxbgzk8EeCKx7czi sJDnjuxzKRc9XjrwyG20PjGxm/5H67LqhfkYQSk3RkJq65UQpAgD49EjMqK6Krd1tEOT D0In8pVRu/JAjulFTKti0nyu7yOKLt3/hYMBM=
>>> We would like to release Eigen 3.0.4 next week, so testing would be
>>> much appreciated on all supported platforms...
>> ...I see
>> icpc 12.0.4 20110427
>> icpc 12.1.0 20111011
>> both build all the 'make check' targets. I noticed some terribly long
>> individual test times for those two builds, e.g.
>> ...
>> 228/593 Test #228: product_trmm_13 .................. Passed 373.70 sec
>> ...
>> which were not consistent with my gcc 4.5.1, intel 10.1, and intel
>> 11.1 test runtimes.
> Can you profile this?
> Is Eigen 3.0.3 performing better?
I'm all thumbs with profilers. I'll see what I can do.
In the meantime, I'm building the outer product of {Intel 11.1 latest,
Intel 12.1 latest} and {3.0.3 release, 3.0 tip} and running the test
suites on a compute node to get better test case timing info. That'll
hopefully give some indication of if it is a 3.0.3 -> 3.0.4 problem or
an Intel 11.1 -> 12.0 -> 12.1 problem.
- Rhys