| Re: [eigen] matrix::linspace |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] matrix::linspace
- From: Hauke Heibel <hauke.heibel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:15:46 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vYG8MsNMIbIKfBZ0X/pToigbvXiAJQwOsps+x4okG1I=; b=H6Jg1hquS3GT8H3YbhmAjKjkuKsrjP19zX5hxEUNP9kX5DCelvPaOCFvKWasHeI0zA DneCxD/QOPa5uccvY/snuSXlGV7ijbOu47znqQofZ1BepDpdb9TvW9CrcpsSVug3Z3oE uY7/ESUcRfONXgl5t6Y+jOuHsQbQLMf0kdkME=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=FS4S1vQWhtCwaIO7T+YzPixD7BCGCjwMaOtfa1PVcn1IFNzvwGQf7w16ncy1Pl/e9r aKGnc8kzzAOyAgyJT3J+31gH/0YBDpkFrVsCdt/ac23cJ7S7mcbQx5m1yyVllscCSnSq ltUN5szsCSEhIdYrnPzAWyOTveI983+yvg4Sc=
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Neither does my approach, once you take it as a partial unrolling. But
> this approach will certainly decrease performance a lot, due to the
> higher number of operations. I don't think that we're really in the
> domain of application of this approach.
But if I'ld use your approach of partial unrolling that would require
a new assignment, right? I don't see how to easily incorporate that
right now and probably you are right, I will skip this 'fancy'
addition scheme...
Hauke