| Re: [eigen] typedef proposal |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] typedef proposal
- From: Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:39:50 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=YaUgaV22ZjQM5z/quI6qxAoPnlXvf7rpFHTOg+m59Mc=; b=L3pKL7ZBTkylrNsB4tzU5T5gP9fqsoi+tXpzRP6jS8Rq29BfAZ5pOyhrH+lGpE2ExP HIiqrByD2iuzxkVSADiwXHpTfohoVk6n3oglOhN/b28SYUjP2SnVa8tV14b7bPrseZiJ HtQrnMh6x7lpqH8dDH0DGeyj6wCQCdtNFsEE0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Q5LT7yE5P5aUlwZyApPDb+PMy4ZdBS4NeC1B9JHjgAlZsOgJ4ovsbLQZjVpO0wku0w AC9IfpUMEW7Q4PHCs6yuR3HjqSduFIDfhw283/innS4nc5BDT4+2HVFjlzBtx/mNmNyp f7skS+4LdPDLUNbedq0YIY7swcdSEVgUVB/WY=
I'm ok too ; my old concern about adding a bunch of typedefs was the
uncertainty over the effect on compilation times, but i just thought
that any nontrivial file using Eigen probably causes the creation of
many hundreds of typedefs anyway (as we have a lot of typedefs in all
the templates).
2009/10/27 Gael Guennebaud <gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> I'm ok with that suggestion.
>
> gael.
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Hauke Heibel <hauke.heibel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Márton Danóczy <marton78@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes. Shouldn't that be Isometry?
>>
>> Of course, and here is the patch... :)
>>
>> - Hauke
>
>