| Re: [eigen] Bounding Volume Hierarchies |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] Bounding Volume Hierarchies
- From: Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 21:42:39 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AlT2qUIGUAyE9QxbmnSjJZSf+MrJi+0lgtz0GMAzW7g=; b=k9zNODpzvrQpjsDZSo6TvHpwjnkebmSSn/kxx6wZeZsvDLr58KY+DXakZb6BHzQSkm Gp/vCBuJbOJ6tAnHo2hDgqPHoK6oBEWTiHrkoFxYV2NS2wSvfN8qKqa9ngmvmHgWjEaQ GMKvwbI8P4+9lSVy47dhsIQEIL6PcMVGyprcI=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Q6ZBreRHMHq710J6XBcwpjLexVrmDdEC9qlttNZTFx1T4Fv43diwZvh4bYNBtfl/5r PmS9bD15GCjYKIR9NmBinHxexhmdG/dDCxql900hackh1fCQhjMLcYur5rWz5CzLR1ha tFQfpopydI+YV2OSyZujew5h+Ik5rNdQamwNo=
> "union" and "intersection" are the obvious choices, "unite" is good
> too. However, "intersect" is confusing because in my brain it would
> return true or false whether the two boxes intersect or not. This is
> why I used "clamp". There is also "crop" , yeah, I know that's not
> better... (about unite vs extend, that's because I did not thought
> about unite)
>
> gael
Ah yes, right. Well, in proper english, that would be "intersects" but
I agree that this little s is a too small difference...
Benoit